A Site For ... S o r e E y e s
Home > Weblog w/e 8.7.2000
|Thursday 7 July 2000, 23:10 BST|
|Confused? You will be [Via Rebecca's Pocket ]|
| Why do
internet users tend to trust brands they're familiar with from offline?
the results of a study which suggests that brands with a pre-existing offline
presence are more trusted than purely online brands. At this stage in the
internet's development, when many users are taking their first, faltering steps
online, this is entirely understandable: paranoia about the safety of online
credit card transactions is going to take some time to fade as people learn
that they can trust online retailers. Furthermore, customer inertia is a hugely
important factor in all, and there's little reason to suppose that for the vast
majority of people this will cease to be the case on the internet: if you
usually buy your books at Waterstone's it's likely you'll try
waterstones.co.uk before going to
The most "trusted" single British web site is that of the BBC , which neatly leads me to an article in today's Guardian. Some of the UK internet business community are complaining about the BBC's massive online presence, claiming that there's plenty of scope for privately-funded sites to provide coverage of news and sports and that the public funding of such a powerful brand is unfair and detrimental to the ability of entrepreneurs to get funding for competing sites. Further evidence of the excellence of the BBC's efforts comes today with the BBC sweeping the board in the online categories at the Association of British Science Writers awards.
As I see it, the BBC is doing what a public service broadcaster should, especially on the news-gathering front: providing informed, in-depth coverage of a wide range of issues on a site which is very usable (not least because it usually provides links both to earlier stories on related topics, and to relevant external sites) and making that information freely available to licence payers. If the BBC didn't have a significant online presence in the medium which, we're always being told, is the future of mass communications, critics would soon accuse it of missing the boat and call into question the BBC's right to collect a licence fee. Why should the BBC be the only major broadcaster which isn't permitted to leverage its content online?
If the BBC site was clearly poorer than its would-be commercial rivals that would be one thing, but the truth is that the BBC is providing good content (especially news ), and surely it's up to competitors to provide content so good that there's no need for any of us to visit the BBC's site? I thought competition was always a good thing.
|Are any parrots reading this page? If there aren't yet, there soon could be . [Via Honeyguide ]|
|Who was your favourite Doctor Who? Do you remember Tom Baker's wonderful scarf? This guy does. [Via Bifurcated Rivets ]|
|Wednesday 5 July 2000, 23:40 BST|
|Salon tells us where members of the Hollywood elite go when they're in need of cash in a hurry . Not what you'd expect.|
| From pawn to
porn. As WAP phones start to, er, penetrate the marketplace,
Wired News tells
us that WAP-enabled porn sites are appearing, and as you'd expect anti-porn
activists are worried. They point out that the greater privacy afforded by the
mobile phone makes it easier to access porn in 'safety', and that it also makes
it more difficult for parents who wish to be responsible and monitor their
childrens' online activities to do so.
It seems to me that the former point is neither here nor there - WAP (in principle) makes all types of online content more available, and until someone comes up with a method of segregating or reliably marking XXX content that's just something we all have to live with. As for the ability to monitor one's children's access (which is a perfectly reasonable practice, after all) the simple solution is to not buy them WAP-enabled phones. I truly doubt that many kids really need wireless internet access at the moment, and in the long run no doubt the suppliers of filtering software will develop versions of their software for WAP systems, or else online "family friendly" WAP portals will appear.
In case anyone's wondering why I'd suggest filtering software as the solution when I've mentioned more than once how unhelpful it can be: I don't oppose people using filtering software if they so desire, I just think that the supplier of such software should be open about what it is they're blocking and the criteria they apply, and that I should be as free to have unfiltered internet access as they are to have filtered access.
|Monday 3 July 2000, 23:15 BST|
|Lightning On Demand. How cool is that ? [Via Bifurcated Rivets ]|
|Tim Berners-Lee came up with the idea of the World Wide Web, and somewhat less than a decade later a good percentage of the households in the developed world have access to the Web. This picture of his original web browser shows that we really haven't come that far software-wise in the years since. Are we overdue for a revolution in browser design, or was it just that Tim Berners-Lee got it very right indeed when he was working at CERN? [Via Pigs & Fishes ]|
|Consumers 1, Greedy bastards 0. It's good to see that occasionally even the biggest companies can be humbled when they try to ride roughshod over their customers' wishes. Now if only the public would wake up to how anti-competitive BT are being over ADSL. [BT/ADSL article via Dan Hon's Daily Doozer ]|
|The Register told us last week about problems users could face in updating their PC's BIOS under Windows 2000 and Windows Millennium Edition. Happily, they now find that Intel have produced a highly effective solution.|
|BBC News Online reports that Anna Provorova, the Russian schoolgirl who lost her place at medical school as a result of writing a letter to President Putin has been offered a scholarship elsewhere. Ironically, journalists analysing the written account of the whole affair produced by the bureaucrats who marked her down have spotted more than 100 errors in spelling and grammar in the report.|
|Sunday 2 July 2000, 23:10 BST|
What do you do with a national network of post
offices, many of which are vital to the local communities they
serve but aren't really economically viable, especially now that you're wanting
to save money by paying as many state benefits by electronic fund transfer as
possible? BBC News Online
that the government's answer is to turn them into replacements for the local
bank branches which are being rationalised out of existence in many small
villages, and to let them serve as internet kiosks and delivery points for
The Register is characteristically sarcastic about this idea, but I think it's a perfectly decent proposition. Admittedly you have to mentally tune out the constant "we're a world leader in e-business" mantra chanted by every minister whose department so much as turns on a computer these days, but once you can get past that nonsense this is a good way to provide new business for small post offices.
screenings are a waste of everybody's time. Former
Party of Five star Neve Campbell recently
starred alongside William H Macey, Tracey Ullman and Donald Sutherland in
Panic , a low-budget film which won rave reviews at the Sundance Film
festival and looked as if it might do good business if it was marketed
carefully. Instead distributors Artisan Entertainment, who bought the rights
after its Sundance triumph, have dumped it straight to cable TV. The reason? It
seems that they put the film before a test audience which didn't like it.
to the Washington Post the problem was that Artisan tested the film before
an audience of ordinary filmgoers, as if it was a summer blockbuster, rather
than finding an audience of arthouse film lovers and planning a campaign to
sell the film to that type of audience.
The problem isn't that a film featuring a favourite actress of mine was dumped. It's that even a smallish distribution company like Artisan, which made its name by carefully orchestrating a campaign to sell us The Blair Witch Project and has also marketed arthouse films like Ghost Dog and Polanski's The Ninth Gate , may now be turning into a risk-averse outfit just like the big studios. [Via TKTV ]
|The Grumpy Old Man is no more. Walter Matthau, star of The Fortune Cookie and dozens of other films , Rest In Peace.|
|You want hot stock picks and hot women? This is the site for you! [Via Metafilter ]|
This page was created using Arachnophilia . It should display properly in any W3C standard-compliant browser.
If you have any questions about this web site, please email me